Popular Posts

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

'Revolutionary Wealth,' by Alvin Toffler and Heidi Toffler - The New York Times Book Review - New York Times

Revolutionary Wealth,' by Alvin Toffler and Heidi Toffler
The Future Is Now Review by NICK GILLESPIE"

Between now and the 21st century, millions of ordinary, psychologically normal people will face an abrupt collision with the future," Alvin Toffler (with a since-acknowledged assist from his wife, Heidi) prophesied at the start of the 1970 best seller "Future Shock." In diagnosing "a new and powerfully upsetting psychological disease," that book, along with works like the Club of Rome's neo-Malthusian tract "Limits to Growth" and Hal Lindsey's Christian jeremiad "The Late Great Planet Earth," helped to define the 70's as a period when smog, the Antichrist and insufferably long guitar solos threatened to destroy the global village as completely as Charlton Heston did at the apocalyptic climax of "Beneath the Planet of the Apes." But "Future Shock" was no typical Me Decade downer.

For the Tofflers, "The Collapse of Hierarchy" and "A Superabundance of Selves" (to quote two section headings in "Future Shock") weren't the disturbing developments they were to appalled social critics like Daniel Bell in "The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism" and Christopher Lasch in "The Culture of Narcissism." The Tofflers believed that rampant technological, economic and cultural innovation was mainly a good thing, or at least potentially liberating for most of us once we learned how to deal with it. When the shock wore off, said the Tofflers, who elaborated their case in "The Third Wave" (1980) and "Powershift" (1990), we'd appreciate a richer, freer, groovier world.

Now the Tofflers are again back from the near future. Their new book, "Revolutionary Wealth," builds on the framework of their previous writings, so there's a lot of talk about clashes among First Wave (agrarian), Second Wave (industrialized) and Third Wave (postindustrial, or "knowledge-based") societies. They argue convincingly that we are on the verge of a post-scarcity world that will slash poverty and "unlock countless opportunities and new life trajectories," at least if we avoid the rapidly escalating risks to such progress.

The Tofflers, whose penchant for neologisms remains unabated, spend much time discussing the booming "prosumer economy" (which involves unpaid work that nevertheless greatly increases quality of life; for example, cooking a lavish meal for friends or much of open-source computer coding) and fretting over "obsoledge" (obsolete knowledge). Terrorism, and potential pandemics have done little to dampen their old optimism. "The long-term reality is that we, as a species, have been getting better" at producing wealth, they say. "If we hadn't, the planet would not now be able to support nearly 6.5 billion of us. We wouldn't live as long as we do. And, for better or worse, we wouldn't have more overweight people than undernourished people on earth — as we do." Life expectancy at birth in the world, they note, including the "poor world," increased 42 percent over the past 50 years.

The titular wealth they speak of comes from substituting "ever-more-refined knowledge for the traditional factors of industrial production — land, labor and capital." The United States is producing more stuff than ever with fewer workers. The Tofflers write that only 20 percent of the work force is now in the manufacturing sector, while some 56 percent (and growing) is engaged in what they call "knowledge work" — managerial, financial, sales-related, clerical and professional tasks. Even activities like agriculture have gone high-tech, through biotechnology and increasingly sophisticated use of global-positioning satellites to customize irrigation and fertilization down to the individual acre. Knowledge-based wealth, they argue, is revolutionary not just because it gets more output from fewer inputs. Unlike such physical resources as oil, knowledge can be shared by an infinite number of people, and its value and benefits are generally increased by wider circulation. (A network, after all, is only as powerful as the number of participants.) Just as important, the Third Wave wealth system "demassifies production, markets and society," creating space for unending experimentation, innovation and individuation.

Forgive the Tofflers their diction, which sometimes reads like the linguistic equivalent of a shag rug. Their schema helps to explain why air quality has improved in American cities over the past 30 years and why American culture has become remarkably more accepting of alternative lifestyles. Yet they are not Panglossian. "The list of potential horrors is seemingly endless," they write, citing a United States-China war, a 21st-century Great Depression, water shortages in the developing world and more. Any of these could slow or reverse today's generally positive trends.

Despite visionary passages about nanotechnology (the manipulation of objects at the atomic level) and potential moon-based helium energy, "Revolutionary Wealth" is less interesting for its specifics (most of which will be familiar to readers of publications like Wired, The Economist and Red Herring) than for its evidence of how far we've come since the 70's, when politics, economics and culture all seemed as played out as Richard Nixon's denials of criminality. In "Future Shock," the Tofflers warned that many people "will find it increasingly painful to keep up with the incessant demand for change that characterizes our time. For them, the future will have arrived too soon." These days, from Baghdad to Bangalore to Boston, it seems more likely that people worry that the future will arrive too late. That's no small change, and it's one on which the Tofflers have been shining a light for years.

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Yahoo Go - The World's First Genuine Personal Entertainment Guide? - Printer Friendly - Talkback - Digital Trends

Dr. Media says, Terry Semel, a guy who used to run a studio, understands a TV network when he see's one, and you thought cable had a lot of channels, how about a cable with an infinite number of channels to suit every taste, and that will go with you where ever you go, now that's personalization. Computer, internet, TV, cable, cellphone, home, office, reminds me of that old joke, you know the Buddhist who asks the hotdog vendor to" make me one with everything", Yahoo makes a move, lets see what Barry Diller does, remember, he used to run a studio as well, we know what Murdoch did, he bought mySpace.






Yahoo Go - The World's First Genuine Personal Entertainment Guide? - Printer Friendly - Talkback - Digital Trends: "
Yahoo Go - The World's First Genuine Personal Entertainment Guide?

Yahoo Go - The World's First Genuine Personal Entertainment Guide?
By TDG Research
May 2nd, 2006

d

By Colin Dixon - IP Media Practice Manager

The Announcement

With the release of Yahoo Go™, Terry Semel believes he now has a solution that could link virtually every facet of our digital lives into a single coherent user experience (bridge the gaps between the solitary 'islands' of our various entertainment experiences). Yahoo! will now be everywhere you are: on your office PC, on your mobile phones, and, as of yesterday, even on your living room TV.

It's not the first time this kind of thing has been attempted, nor will it be the last. To attain 'omnipresence' is a goal of every major media company including Google, Disney, Viacom, and many others. However, this is the first time a system operator (be it a virtual one) has attempted to embrace their users in every facet of their lives. It is breath-taking in its scope, even if a little clunky in execution.

The Details

At the January 2006 Consumer Electronic Show, Yahoo! CEO Terry Semel publicly announced the Yahoo! Go initiative, a platform by which the Company would reach each user with Yahoo!-branded services on every digital device they own. As Mr. Semel said, the "Electronic Joe" has "Invested a lot of time and a lot of energy setting up their world on the PC and they now want the ability to take that information wherever they go." With last week's purchase of Meedio (a manufacturer of media PC, DVR and automation software), Yahoo! gained the intellectual property it needed to transform the PC into a whole-home media engine and deliver a full PVR experience including an integrated program guide to any networked TV in the home.

As well, Yahoo! can now deliver its entire library of web-based content to the TV, if the user is willing to go through the pains of hooking the PC to the TV.

The Logic

If we look at what others are doing to link the PC to the TV, we immediately bump into two industry titans: Microsoft and Intel. Microsoft has put its full weight behind Media Center Edition, having seen the opportunity to lock-down the role of home media hub for the PC and, by default, for Microsoft. Intel recently jumped into this space with the ViiV initiative, seeking to make the flow of media between digital devices a seamless experience.

On the face of it, it would appear that Yahoo! is suddenly in competition with both Microsoft and Intel - not a good place to be! After all, this is among WinTel's key strategic concentrations, so any alternative vision to turn the PC into a home media hub or persuade users to hook the PC to the TV would be highly offensive to both Intel and Microsoft.

But Yahoo! Go also enables consumers to organize photos, videos and music and then ship this content around between your home or laptop PCs, mobile phones, and home TVs in a seamless and easy-to-use fashion - but isn't this the vision behind Intel's Viiv?

So it would seem that Yahoo! is squaring off against Microsoft and Intel. So how does Yahoo! stack up against the technology competition? In short, pretty well.

First, the software is free! Hands-down this wins over spending money on a Windows Media Center or Intel ViiV-powered device. Of course, you still need to have a media-friendly PC with a built in TV tuner card (or Yahoo! can show you where to easily find and order one). But if you already have a PC with these features, Yahoo wins hand down on the issue of cost.

Second, Yahoo! provides wonderfully simple, step-by-step instructions to help consumers get the TV hooked up to the PC. No, they don't talk about using digital media adapters (a topic that should be avoided until consumers are ready to tackle that complexity), so as long as you're willing to place the PC next to a TV, connecting the PC the TV is as simple as connecting a DVD player to an A/V receiver - in fact, the way Yahoo! describes the process (using simple terms, warm colors, and clear, understandable graphics), one has to pause and appreciate the simplicity.

But to focus on the technology is to miss the more important point. For Microsoft and Intel, technology sales are the end game. For Yahoo!, technology is merely a means to an end - it is secondary to Yahoo!'s larger ambition to control the platform interface and the distribution of digital content distribution. If that prioritization sounds familiar, it should. It is the modus operandi of your cable or satellite company.

The Implications

As Terry Semel said at January's CES, Yahoo! Go has four objectives:

  • To create a seamless experience between devices;
  • To utilize the particular device to its best advantage;
  • To know better the end-user; and
  • To base the entire effort on open standards.

For those of you that read my report on the Interactive Program Guide space released last November, you are already familiar with these points. Mr. Semel is describing what I then called a "Personal Entertainment Guide" or "PEG."

With Yahoo!'s intended arrival in the TV environment, it aspires to become the user's guide to all media, delivering a rich variety of content to users wherever they are, whenever they want. The Yahoo! user no longer needs the clunky program guide provided by the cable or satellite vendor. Consumers can use the richness of the web to find the entertainment they're interested in. Not only can they find TV shows and schedule them to record on their PVR, they can chose from the endless bounty of the web and view it all from the comfort of their couch. And all courtesy of the Yahoo! PEG.

This would appear to be the worst of nightmares for traditional PayTV operators. Suddenly, they become part of a Yahoo!-defined walled garden of sorts, hidden behind the Yahoo!-branded user interface and reduced to a simple pipe that delivers broadcast television. Without their own proprietary IPG being used, how can they sell pay-per-view and VOD movies? How can they sell their premium sports packages? A fortune in incremental revenue is suddenly at risk, and the possible loss of identity with their subscribers would have a catastrophic financial impact on traditional PayTV providers. Simply stated, adding an unregulated and "unwalled" Internet connection to the TV experience, and then allowing a company like Yahoo! to steal the IPG interface, is the last thing any rational PayTV operator wants to see.

The Bottom Line

The web has revolutionized every market it has touched. How fitting that the revolution in entertainment should be brought into sharp focus by a child of its domain. Yahoo! has evolved beyond the simple web portal of its youth into a new type of system operator - network agnostic virtual operator (NAVO, if you will) that doesn't own multi-systems but rides its multiple services on the networks of others. Through its personal entertainment guide, the NAVO can reach users through their cellphones, PCs, and TVs delivering content whenever and wherever they want.

Yahoo! has taken the next step in challenging the dominance of the traditional MSOs. Brian Roberts and Rupert Murdoch will likely look back in the coming years and ask where all their incremental revenue has gone. One thing is for sure; Terry Semel knows!